I don’t know
if it is unique to us here in the United States or a worldwide phenomenon, but when
we have a behavior problem here in this country, we definitely have a strong
tendency to characterize that problem by its symptoms and focus all our
energies on trying to eliminate those symptoms; instead of focusing on the
cause of the problem.
When people
use illegal drugs, like methamphetamine and heroin, we say we have a drug
problem and declare war on drugs to try to reduce the availability of the
drugs. When Muslim Jihadists terrorize
western cities we say we have a terrorist problem and declare war on terror to
try to eliminate the terrorists. And when people kill other people with guns we
say we have a gun violence problem and scream “Make it harder for people to buy
guns.” None of these responses address why people do these things. Dealing with the symptom of a problem instead of dealing with the cause of the problem is as uselss as "putting the cart before the horse".
If you’ve
been following this blog, you may remember I pointed out in my very first post
(HOW BAD IS BAD – June 20. 2017) that bad behavior is willful. People choose to
behave badly and they do so for a reason, usually because it meets a need. I
also pointed out in a subsequent post (THE CATCH IN THE CONSEQUENCE – July 5,
2017) that if people are behaving badly because it meets a need, we are not
going to stop that bad behavior until we figure out what that need is and
address it.
Don’t get me
wrong. I am NOT against regulation. In a civilized society, anything that is
potentially dangerous to the public needs to be regulated; and most things are
(i.e. driving a car, flying a plane, performing surgery, prescribing medicine, operating a restaurant, selling
alcohol or cigarettes, building a house, etc.). Dangerous drugs need to be
controlled, people associated with known terrorist organizations need to be
kept off airplanes and it’s probably fair to say there need to be some
restrictions on who can own guns and what kinds of guns they can own. I am just trying to point out that eliminating the symptom of a problem
doesn’t solve the problem. When we slowed the flow of cocaine coming into the U.S. from Latin America, the people who were
using cocaine didn’t stop using drugs. They switched to using methamphetamine,
which they could make themselves in a cabin in the woods. When we required
passengers boarding an airplane to go through a metal detector, people who
wanted to cause havoc on airplanes switched from carrying a box cutter in their
pocket to putting a bomb in their shoe. Making guns harder to buy legally will
just mean that people who want guns will have to buy them illegally.
Getting to
the root causes of these behavior problems will be difficult. We may very well
find that these behaviors, these symptoms, are caused by flaws in some of our
basic belief systems, like capitalism and religion, or the failure of some of
our essential institutions, like education and health care. In fact, I’m pretty
sure that is exactly what we will find and I am also pretty sure we know that’s
what we’ll find, which is why we don’t want to go there - don’t even want to
look. It’s a lot easier to just go after the symptoms and tell ourselves we’re
doing the best we can. It’s just that eliminating the symptoms of a problem
won’t solve the problem. Our problems will just get worse until we deal with
what’s causing them.
In 2002, a
year to the date after 9/11, I attended the Youth Employment Summit in
Alexandria, Egypt as part of a delegation from the National Youth Employment Coalition. Youth practitioners from more than 160 countries came to the conference looking
for ways to deal with the fact that a billion young people worldwide would be
entering the workforce over the next 10 years while only three hundred million
workers would be retiring or otherwise leaving the workforce. Mrs. Hosni
Mubarak, the wife of the President of Egypt, was the keynote speaker. She set
the tone for the conference by calling attention to these statistics and
pointing out that “If we, the nations of the world, do not find ways to provide
these young people with gainful employment they will most assuredly disrupt our
communities and destabilize our societies”. Apparently, her husband, President
Mubarak, didn’t listen to his wife’s speech because nine years later, in 2011, he
was thrown out of office and put in prison (where he remained for six years)
during the Arab Spring uprising in Egypt, which was led by young Egyptians who
couldn’t find jobs because not enough new jobs had been created.
Obviously, there
is a moral to this story - Always listen to your wife.
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home